Rubrics

Rubrics for Assignments Case Study Presentation Blog Postings Design Posters
 * Category || 4 points || 3 points || 2 points || 1 point ||
 * Research || All required research elements are present. (Bullet points on assignment page) || Missing 1 required research element. || Missing 2 required research elements. || Missing more than 2 required research elements. ||
 * Content Knowledge || Student shows 90%-100% understanding of the required content. || Student shows 80%-89% understanding of the required content. || Student shows 70%-79% understanding of the required content. || Student shows less than 70% understanding of the required content. ||
 * Presentation || Speaks clearly and distinctly 90%-100% of the time. Stands up straight and establishes eye contact with audience during the entire presentation. || Speaks clearly and distinctly 80%-89% of the time. Stands up straight and establishes eye contact with audience during most of the presentation. || Speaks clearly and distinctly 70%-79% of the time. Sometimes stands up straight and establishes eye contact. || Speaks clearly and distinctly less than 70% of the time. Hard to understand. Slouches and break eye contact frequently. ||
 * Presentation Medium || The medium used to present added a professionalism to the presentation and enhanced the content being presented. || The medium used to present was pleasing to the audience and did not distract from the content being presented. || The medium used to present was distracting to the audience at times. || The medium used to present was not appropriate for the content and distracted the audience frequently. ||
 * Category || 3 points || 2 points || 1 point || 0 points ||
 * Engagement with Key Concepts || Blog entries demonstrate engagement with the important issues raised through readings and/or building challenges. || Blog entries demonstrate awareness of most (85%) of the key issues raised through readings and/or building challenges. || Blog entries make some reference (70%) to issues raised through readings and/or building challenges. || Blog entries make no reference to issues raised through readings and/building challenges. ||
 * Personal Response to Key Concepts || Blog entries convey extensive evidence of a personal response to the issues raised in the readings/challenges. || Blog entries convey evidence (85%) of a personal response to the issues raised in the readings/ challenges. || Blog entries convey little evidence (70%) of a personal response to the issues/concepts raised in the readings/challenges. || Blog entries show no personal response is made to the issues/concepts raised in the readings/challenges ||
 * Grammar || Blog entries show a very good command of Standard English (no grammar mistakes) and have some flair and originality. || Blog entries show a good command of Standard English (1-2 grammar mistakes). No problems for your audience. || Blog entries demonstrate some evidence of Standard English (3-4 grammar mistakes). Audience will have little trouble reading your blog. || Blog entries use incorrect grammar and syntax consistently, making it difficult for others to follow. (More than 4 mistakes). ||
 * Category || 2 points || 1 point || 0 points ||
 * Drawings || Drawings are complete and are labeled and demonstrate the student's understanding of the building challenge. || Drawings are not complete or are not labeled. Does not demonstrate a full understanding of the building challenge. || No drawings ||
 * Explanation || Explanations are well developed, with detail and examples of reasoning given. Explanations demonstrate the student's understanding of the building challenge. || Explanations are not fully developed, detail is missing. Does not demonstrate a full understanding of the building challenge. || No explanation ||